Skip to main content

New Income Tax Rules – Submission of false Aadhaar number may be fined Rs. 10,000

As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.

DTC Bill in Winter Session : Provision of Fourth slab may introduce.......


The finance ministry on Wednesday said it is finalizing the official amendments to the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) Bill so that it could be taken up in the winter session of Parliament beginning 5 December.

“We are working on the DTC Bill and want to bring it as soon as possible,” revenue secretary Sumit Bose said on the sidelines of a Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) summit.

The finance ministry is currently working on the official amendments to the DTC Bill which was tabled in Parliament earlier.


Meanwhile, a senior finance ministry official said that the amendments to the Bill would be placed before the cabinet shortly for approval.

“The finance ministry wants to bring it in the winter session of Parliament,” the official added.

Among other things, the DTC Bill proposes a higher income tax rate of 35%.
While the Bill proposes to keep exemption limit at Rs.2 lakh for individual tax unchanged, it proposes to introduce a fourth slab of 35% tax rate for those with an annual income of over Rs.10 crore.

It also proposes to levy a 10% tax on dividend income of more than Rs.1 crore.

Besides, minimum alternate tax (MAT) may be levied on book profit and not on gross assets, people familiar with the matter said. Further, the securities transaction tax (STT) is likely to be retained, though the standing committee on finance, which had scrutinized the Bill, had suggested abolition of the levy.

At present, tax is levied on income between Rs.2-5 lakh at 10%, Rs.5-10 lakh at 20%, and above Rs.10 lakh at 30%. Further, those earning more than Rs.1 crore have to pay a surcharge of 10%.

The finance ministry, according to people familiar with the matter, had accepted most of the recommendations of the standing committee.
On whether there is a scope for lowering the rate of corporate tax, the official said it is not possible in India.

The DTC Bill, which aims to rationalize tax rates to bring more people and companies under the tax net and overhaul the Income Tax Act of 1961, was introduced in Parliament in 2010.

The Bill has retained the 30% tax on companies, which was also the recommendation of the standing committee. The first draft of the Bill was prepared by finance minister P. Chidambaram in 2009, followed by a second draft by the then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, which was later sent to the standing committee for their recommendations.

The first draft prepared by Chidambaram in 2009 had proposed a 10% income tax on slabs of Rs.1.6-10 lakh, 20% on slabs of Rs.10-25 lakh and 30% on Rs.25 lakh and above. Besides, corporate tax was proposed at 25%.
This was followed by the draft DTC Bill prepared by Mukherjee in 2010, which proposed income tax of 10% for Rs.2-5 lakh slabs, 20% for Rs.5-10 lakh and 30% for Rs.10 lakh and above besides corporate tax at 30%. The standing committee suggested slabs of Rs.3-10 lakh, Rs.10-20 lakh and Rs.20 lakh and above. On corporate tax, it recommended the rate be retained at 30%.


Source : Mint News

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Income Tax Rules – Submission of false Aadhaar number may be fined Rs. 10,000

As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.

DA will be 100% w.e.f. January 2014

Now it is very clear from the AICPIN issued today that DA will be 100% w.e.f. January 2014. Decline in AICPIN for December, 2013 vanished the expectation for crossing the DA from 100%. However, it will give a great relief to Central Government Employees and Pensioners as DA will be enhanced by 10% again. View ITian India on Facebook View statistics data for AICPIN here

Last date for filing the acknowledgement extended for AY 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

As per the new circular dated 10.02.2014, Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of powers under section 119 (2) (a) of the Act, hereby further relaxes and extends the date for filing ITR -V Form for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 till 31.03.2014 for returns e-Filed with refund claims within the time allowed under section 139 of the Act. The taxpayer concerned may send a duly signed copy of ITR-'V' to the CPC by this date by speed post In such cases, Central Board of Direct Taxes also relaxes the time-frame of issuing the intimation as provided in second proviso to sub section (1) of Section 143 of the Act and directs that such returns shall be processed within a period of six months from end of the month in which ITR-V is received and the intimation of processing of such returns shall be sent to the assessee concerned as per laid down procedure. Provision of sub-section (2) of section 244A of the Act would apply while determining the interest on such refund