As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.
After the promotion from Income
Tax Inspectors to Income Tax Officers, Chandigarh(NWR) Region also released
promotion order to Income Tax Inspectors and became the first region which
promoted ITIs due to cadre restructuring. It is pertinent to note here that DPC
has been held following the existing Recruitment Rules. As per this order promotion
made vide this DPC is provisional and is subject to any review DPC taking place
for any contingency like number of vacancies, fixation of seniority, change in
recruitment rules etc. and direction of any Court / CBDT / DOPT '.
“What was the hurry in releasing this
promotion order?”
Now this is question in
every mind as the implementation of cadre restructuring should be done with new
recruitment rules. Friends, here is the contents of reports of subcommittee
that is sufficient to justify this question.
"As
promotion to the post of Inspectors shall henceforth be only from Executive
Assistants, the existing system of quotas in promotion for Ministerial Staff
and Stenographers has become redundant and accordingly, has been done away
with. For the same reason, for the existing provisions relating to quota for
promotion on the basis of seniority and date of passing has been deleted." (View previous post in this regard)
As per the information available
till date the above contents of the report of sub-committee is still not
amended.
Comments
Post a Comment